Analogical reasoning from the perspective of Relational Frame Theory

Authors

  • Leticia Fiorentini Universidad de Buenos Aires
  • Mariana Arismendi Universidad de Buenos Aires
  • Gerardo Primero Universidad de Buenos Aires
  • Angel Tabullo Universidad de Buenos Aires
  • Sandra Vanotti Universidad de Buenos Aires
  • Alberto Yorio Universidad de Buenos Aires

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31505/rbtcc.v14i1.494

Keywords:

relational frame theory, analogical reasoning, stimulus equivalence classes, neuropsychological assessment, cognitive rehabilitation

Abstract

The main goal of the present work is to summarize the Relational Frame Theory (RFT) account of ana-logical reasoning, reviewing theoretical models and experimental studies published so far. Additionally, developmental studies of analogical reasoning during childhood will be addressed, considering the alternative hypothesis and controversies between different psychological theories. Findings from cognitive studies using neuroimaging techniques will also be discussed. Finally, the potential applications of the paradigm will be considered. The studies reviewed about analogical reasoning from the RFT provide relevant empirical evidence, mainly in the field of assessment and suggest advantages of this paradigm compared to cognitivist approaches. In turn, its implementation is proposed as a tool for cognitive training. In conclusion, the RFT offers a useful model to study analogical reasoning from the behavior analysis perspective.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2012-07-04

How to Cite

Fiorentini, L., Arismendi, M., Primero, G., Tabullo, A., Vanotti, S., & Yorio, A. (2012). Analogical reasoning from the perspective of Relational Frame Theory. Brazilian Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy, 14(1), 57–73. https://doi.org/10.31505/rbtcc.v14i1.494

Issue

Vol. 14 No. 1 (2012)

Section

Articles

License

The Brazilian Journal of Cognitive and Behavioral Therapy own the copyright of all articles published by it. The reproduction of articles in this journal in other publications, or for any other purpose, by any other means, requires permission from the Editor.

Pre-Print, Accepted Manuscript, and Final Published Version Archiving, Sharing and Re-Use Policy

The authors’ contribution to RBTCC has three versions, which are defined below and can be archived, shared, and re-used under the following conditions:

1. A pre-print (or original submission) is the author’s version of the article before peer-review has taken place. Prior to acceptance for publication, author(s) retain the right to make a Pre-Print of their article available: on their own personal, self-maintained website; or on a legally compliant pre-print server (e.g., PsyArXiv, arXiv). Once the article has been published, the author(s) should update their acknowledgement and provide a link to the definitive version on RBTCC’s website, adding a text such as: “This is a pre-print of an article published in the Brazilian Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy. The final authenticated version is available online at: https://doi.org/[insert DOI]”. RBTCC encourages posting of preprints of manuscripts on preprint servers, authors’ or institutional websites, and open communications between researchers whether on community preprint servers or preprint commenting platforms. Posting of preprints is not considered prior publication and will not jeopardize consideration from RBTCC. Authors should disclose details of preprint posting - including DOI and licensing terms - upon submission of the manuscript or at any other point during consideration at RBTCC publication process.

2. An accepted manuscript is the version accepted for publication in RBTCC following peer review but prior to copyediting and typesetting that can be made available under the following conditions:

(i) on their own personal, self-maintained website immediately on acceptance,

(ii) for public release, 12 months after first publication (i.e., "Embargo Period"), on any of the following: their employer’s internal website; their institutional and/or funder repositories. Accepted manuscripts may also be deposited in such repositories immediately on acceptance, provided that they are not made publicly available until after the Embargo Period.

An acknowledgement in the following form should be included with a link to the published version on the publisher’s website: “This is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of an article published in the Brazilian Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy. The final authenticated version is available online at: http://dx.doi.org/[insert DOI]”.

3. The final published (PDF) version is the copy-edited and typeset RBTCC’s PDF, the same version published on the journal’s website. It can be archived in institutional or funder repositories and can be made publicly accessible immediately.

Any re-use terms for users of websites and repositories (where your pre-print or accepted manuscript are posted) are restricted to non-commercial and no derivative uses.

The authors may not republish or translate any version of their contribution in another journal without prior permission from RBTCC’s Editor-in-Chief.