An analysis of sports ethics from a radical behavioristic standpoint

Authors

  • Amanda Oliveira de Morais UEM
  • Camila Muchon de Melo UEL
  • Silvia Regina de Souza

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31505/rbtcc.v18i3.921

Keywords:

fair play, sportsmanship, radical behaviorism, moral behavior

Abstract

The objective of this work was to analyze sports ethics from B.F. Skinner’s Radical Behaviorism standpoint. Thus, the sports context was characterized and as well as how sports ethics is understood traditionally. Next, the Skinnerian description of how we value good/bad, moral/immoral, ethical/unethical things is presented. Then, the sports context was analyzed based on the concepts analyzed, discussing the importance of the fair play notion. Value judgements are based on reinforcement effects and on selective contingencies satisfaction. Sports have formally established rules for “legal” and “illegal” conducts, codes of conduct and informal values that classify behavior into sporting and non-sporting. Sportsmanship or fair play involves not only prudence (playing according to the rules) but also problem-solving and decision-making behaviors before situations that generate conflict of consequences for individuals, groups or cultures.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2017-03-15

How to Cite

Morais, A. O. de, Melo, C. M. de, & Souza, S. R. de. (2017). An analysis of sports ethics from a radical behavioristic standpoint. Brazilian Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy, 18(3), 41–57. https://doi.org/10.31505/rbtcc.v18i3.921

Issue

Vol. 18 No. 3 (2016)

Section

Artigos Conceituais

License

The Brazilian Journal of Cognitive and Behavioral Therapy own the copyright of all articles published by it. The reproduction of articles in this journal in other publications, or for any other purpose, by any other means, requires permission from the Editor.

Pre-Print, Accepted Manuscript, and Final Published Version Archiving, Sharing and Re-Use Policy

The authors’ contribution to RBTCC has three versions, which are defined below and can be archived, shared, and re-used under the following conditions:

1. A pre-print (or original submission) is the author’s version of the article before peer-review has taken place. Prior to acceptance for publication, author(s) retain the right to make a Pre-Print of their article available: on their own personal, self-maintained website; or on a legally compliant pre-print server (e.g., PsyArXiv, arXiv). Once the article has been published, the author(s) should update their acknowledgement and provide a link to the definitive version on RBTCC’s website, adding a text such as: “This is a pre-print of an article published in the Brazilian Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy. The final authenticated version is available online at: https://doi.org/[insert DOI]”. RBTCC encourages posting of preprints of manuscripts on preprint servers, authors’ or institutional websites, and open communications between researchers whether on community preprint servers or preprint commenting platforms. Posting of preprints is not considered prior publication and will not jeopardize consideration from RBTCC. Authors should disclose details of preprint posting - including DOI and licensing terms - upon submission of the manuscript or at any other point during consideration at RBTCC publication process.

2. An accepted manuscript is the version accepted for publication in RBTCC following peer review but prior to copyediting and typesetting that can be made available under the following conditions:

(i) on their own personal, self-maintained website immediately on acceptance,

(ii) for public release, 12 months after first publication (i.e., "Embargo Period"), on any of the following: their employer’s internal website; their institutional and/or funder repositories. Accepted manuscripts may also be deposited in such repositories immediately on acceptance, provided that they are not made publicly available until after the Embargo Period.

An acknowledgement in the following form should be included with a link to the published version on the publisher’s website: “This is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of an article published in the Brazilian Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy. The final authenticated version is available online at: http://dx.doi.org/[insert DOI]”.

3. The final published (PDF) version is the copy-edited and typeset RBTCC’s PDF, the same version published on the journal’s website. It can be archived in institutional or funder repositories and can be made publicly accessible immediately.

Any re-use terms for users of websites and repositories (where your pre-print or accepted manuscript are posted) are restricted to non-commercial and no derivative uses.

The authors may not republish or translate any version of their contribution in another journal without prior permission from RBTCC’s Editor-in-Chief.