Radical Behaviorism and Libertarian Paternalism
A Comparative Epistemological Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31505/rbtcc.v23i1.1521Keywords:
behavior analysis, radical behaviorism, epistemology, libertarian paternalism, behavioral economicsAbstract
Both radical behaviorists and libertarian paternalists propose that scientific knowledge about human behavior be used to modify cultural practices. However, Skinner's idea of cultural planning has not achieved the same success that Thaler and Sustein's nudges have achieved in recent years. The purpose of this article is to make a comparison of these two proposals, having in mind, mainly, the epistemological conceptions underlying them. One of the main differences observed concerns the way in which the authors conceive the relationship between basic research and application. This factor seems to be relevant to explain the different levels of social impact obtained by each proposal, but they are not enough. It is also necessary to take into account that Thaler and Sustein's intervention model can produce effects in larger groups and with less effort than required by the type of intervention idealized by Skinner.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Brazilian Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The Brazilian Journal of Cognitive and Behavioral Therapy own the copyright of all articles published by it. The reproduction of articles in this journal in other publications, or for any other purpose, by any other means, requires permission from the Editor.
Pre-Print, Accepted Manuscript, and Final Published Version Archiving, Sharing and Re-Use Policy
The authors’ contribution to RBTCC has three versions, which are defined below and can be archived, shared, and re-used under the following conditions:
1. A pre-print (or original submission) is the author’s version of the article before peer-review has taken place. Prior to acceptance for publication, author(s) retain the right to make a Pre-Print of their article available: on their own personal, self-maintained website; or on a legally compliant pre-print server (e.g., PsyArXiv, arXiv). Once the article has been published, the author(s) should update their acknowledgement and provide a link to the definitive version on RBTCC’s website, adding a text such as: “This is a pre-print of an article published in the Brazilian Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy. The final authenticated version is available online at: https://doi.org/[insert DOI]”. RBTCC encourages posting of preprints of manuscripts on preprint servers, authors’ or institutional websites, and open communications between researchers whether on community preprint servers or preprint commenting platforms. Posting of preprints is not considered prior publication and will not jeopardize consideration from RBTCC. Authors should disclose details of preprint posting - including DOI and licensing terms - upon submission of the manuscript or at any other point during consideration at RBTCC publication process.
2. An accepted manuscript is the version accepted for publication in RBTCC following peer review but prior to copyediting and typesetting that can be made available under the following conditions:
(i) on their own personal, self-maintained website immediately on acceptance,
(ii) for public release, 12 months after first publication (i.e., "Embargo Period"), on any of the following: their employer’s internal website; their institutional and/or funder repositories. Accepted manuscripts may also be deposited in such repositories immediately on acceptance, provided that they are not made publicly available until after the Embargo Period.
An acknowledgement in the following form should be included with a link to the published version on the publisher’s website: “This is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of an article published in the Brazilian Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy. The final authenticated version is available online at: http://dx.doi.org/[insert DOI]”.
3. The final published (PDF) version is the copy-edited and typeset RBTCC’s PDF, the same version published on the journal’s website. It can be archived in institutional or funder repositories and can be made publicly accessible immediately.
Any re-use terms for users of websites and repositories (where your pre-print or accepted manuscript are posted) are restricted to non-commercial and no derivative uses.
The authors may not republish or translate any version of their contribution in another journal without prior permission from RBTCC’s Editor-in-Chief.
