Indirect Functional Assessment of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder in clinical context.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31505/rbtcc.v22i1.1247Keywords:
behavior analysis; obsessive-compulsive disorder; indirect functional assessment; clinical context; clinical practice.Abstract
In Behavioral Therapy, it is necessary to know the function of behavior when planning interventions, which are individualized, efficient, and produce long-term results. The aim of this study was to identify the role of obsessive-compulsive behaviors in adolescents based on strategies of indirect functional assessment, evaluating the occurrence of these behaviors in "social", "demands", "leisure" and "alone" contexts, according to the Functional Analysis model proposed by Iwata, Dorsey, Slifer, Bauman, & Richman (1994). The results indicated that, in addition to the possible negative sensorial reinforcement produced by obsessive compulsive behaviors, the liberation of social consequences and the withdrawal of demands would be important conditions in the maintenance of OCD. The results can either indicate a multiple control of the contingencies involved in the maintenance of the evaluated responses, or a fragility of the procedure in differentiating the relevant contingencies. Additional experimental tests and the evaluation of functionally oriented interventions would confirm the hypotheses raised.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Brazilian Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The Brazilian Journal of Cognitive and Behavioral Therapy own the copyright of all articles published by it. The reproduction of articles in this journal in other publications, or for any other purpose, by any other means, requires permission from the Editor.
Pre-Print, Accepted Manuscript, and Final Published Version Archiving, Sharing and Re-Use Policy
The authors’ contribution to RBTCC has three versions, which are defined below and can be archived, shared, and re-used under the following conditions:
1. A pre-print (or original submission) is the author’s version of the article before peer-review has taken place. Prior to acceptance for publication, author(s) retain the right to make a Pre-Print of their article available: on their own personal, self-maintained website; or on a legally compliant pre-print server (e.g., PsyArXiv, arXiv). Once the article has been published, the author(s) should update their acknowledgement and provide a link to the definitive version on RBTCC’s website, adding a text such as: “This is a pre-print of an article published in the Brazilian Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy. The final authenticated version is available online at: https://doi.org/[insert DOI]”. RBTCC encourages posting of preprints of manuscripts on preprint servers, authors’ or institutional websites, and open communications between researchers whether on community preprint servers or preprint commenting platforms. Posting of preprints is not considered prior publication and will not jeopardize consideration from RBTCC. Authors should disclose details of preprint posting - including DOI and licensing terms - upon submission of the manuscript or at any other point during consideration at RBTCC publication process.
2. An accepted manuscript is the version accepted for publication in RBTCC following peer review but prior to copyediting and typesetting that can be made available under the following conditions:
(i) on their own personal, self-maintained website immediately on acceptance,
(ii) for public release, 12 months after first publication (i.e., "Embargo Period"), on any of the following: their employer’s internal website; their institutional and/or funder repositories. Accepted manuscripts may also be deposited in such repositories immediately on acceptance, provided that they are not made publicly available until after the Embargo Period.
An acknowledgement in the following form should be included with a link to the published version on the publisher’s website: “This is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of an article published in the Brazilian Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy. The final authenticated version is available online at: http://dx.doi.org/[insert DOI]”.
3. The final published (PDF) version is the copy-edited and typeset RBTCC’s PDF, the same version published on the journal’s website. It can be archived in institutional or funder repositories and can be made publicly accessible immediately.
Any re-use terms for users of websites and repositories (where your pre-print or accepted manuscript are posted) are restricted to non-commercial and no derivative uses.
The authors may not republish or translate any version of their contribution in another journal without prior permission from RBTCC’s Editor-in-Chief.
